History of the Pale Moon project
This project started off as merely fiddling with the build process on Windows, seeing first off if I
could manage to make my own Windows build of the Firefox browser and then seeing how my own builds compared
to official ones. Finding the difference significant, the resulting browsers (simply "my own Firefox
builds") were given to a number of friends to use, with very positive results.
This was back in the time when Firefox was still in its 1.5.x stage.
I have since built Firefox, Thunderbird and Seamonkey specifically for different systems, gaining
experience, learning the quirks and following code development. Eventually, with Firefox 3.5.2, I settled
on what I found was an optimal compromise between speed, features and useability of the browser. At that
point in time, the Pale Moon project was given shape, releasing the highly optimized browser to the public
from Oct 4th, 2009.
Since its release, it has become rather popular, with no less than 15,000 visits to the home page just in
the first month of release. With many downloads from a wide range of locations, not all of them monitored
or counted, it is anyone's guess how many people are actually using it, but it has surpassed anything that
was initially expected.
Feedback had been positive, and as a result of several requests from people, a second build version was
created of Pale Moon, to cater specifically to the capabilities of Athlon XP and Athlon MP processors,
still extremely popular processors for systems used at the time. Later on, a portable version was also
created to allow people to take Pale Moon with them on USB stick or removable drives.
As the source code developed, so did Pale Moon, and a few major changes have been made with the transition
from 3.5 to 3.6 versions and later on to separate Pale Moon installations from Firefox ones. Always
attempting to strike a balance, some minor features were removed, and later added again; feedback from the
users has always been taken into account, and the development of Pale Moon has therefore been given shape,
in part, by its users.
When version 4.0 of the Firefox code arrived, after extensive betas, Pale Moon deviated further from its
sibling by also making changes to the standard UI (User Interface) layout. UI design choices made to
"innovate" the user interface, removing quite essential user feedback and changing the layout of navigation
controls were considered to be poor choices, and have been altered to provide a more familiar, and also
more intuitive, interface to the browser.
At this point it was also decided to keep developing the 3.6.x branch separately, while version 4 and later
became the "next generation" branch.
An accelerated major version release scheme was started on in early 2011, with ambitious plans by Mozilla
to make faster changes to Firefox. When version 5.0 arrived, though, it turned out to be a release that
could just as well have been numbered 4.1 or similar, as there was surprisingly little that had changed,
apart from correcting some mistakes made in the implementation of 4.0. 5.0 can therefore best be considered
a "bugfix release" of 4.0, and not really a new product.
Version 6.0 saw a similarly small amount of changes and both 5.0 and 6.0 have been considered to be a
continuation of the "next generation" branch of the Firefox product started with version 4.0. As such, 4.0
and 5.0 were discontinued for Pale Moon. This trend was continued for later versions.
In Oct 2011, a new milestone was reached with Pale Moon 7: better resource use, faster code, and maturation
of the code base to a level where 3.x now became depreciated in favor of this version - still, the old
branch continued to be supported and developed because there was still a clear need for it, and remained
the browser of choice for "special needs" environments.
From this point on, development on the Next Generation (versions 4 and up) branch continued, following
Mozilla Firefox for most major releases, while the 3.6.x (Legacy) branch continued to see patches for
bugfixes, security issues and some performance improvements, including continued support beyond Mozilla's
EoL (End of Life) date for the 3.x branch. Inevitably, though, the older engine started falling terribly
short of its intended purpose, and as more and more sites became problematic, the legacy branch was
discontinued in the summer of 2012.
April 2012 saw another milestone with the release of version 12, at which point the release schedule
stopped following Mozilla's rapid release schedule of Firefox. From this point on, development and release
of Pale Moon became fully independent and more specifically aimed at refining the engine and features and
implementing additional, Pale Moon specific features. Pale Moon diverged from its sibling with each release
into a separate, independent browser not longer necessarily tied to Firefox code development or release,
although a close parallel was maintained for extension compatibility by rebasing Pale Moon code on top of
later Firefox versions.
With the release of Firefox 24 (and Pale Moon of the same version), Pale Moon's already divergent
development direction started to more clearly separate from Firefox than it had already done before, by
focusing much more strongly on individual development of interface, features and back-end, while adopting
continued security updates through Firefox's ESR channel. After a year of this development (and turbulent
times for Firefox with the growing dislike for the decisions made about the browser by their development
and management teams), the decision was made for Pale Moon to completely and decisively break the existing
direct ties with Firefox (in the form of how it identifies itself) and be a completely independent force on
the browser market.
This is where we are now, with Pale Moon 25 and later: a fully independent browser product.
outline Mozilla has sketched seems to be to make Firefox more than a
browser, and to spread thin across many different disciplines and
platforms in an attempt to make a web-OS, Skype client alternative, App
developer environment, mobile phone OS, media player and/or swiss army knife out of
it, as well as increasing ties with on-line commercial ventures like
Google, Yahoo, social media sites, Hello, Pocket, and whomever wishes
to pay to be advertised in the browser. These plans may look nice on
paper, but would most likely see a vast amount of practical issues when
trying to implement them, as has already been shown in decreasing
stability and usability in the Firefox browser in recent times. Not to
mention: users have voiced that they are very regularly not looking for
whatever mozilla decides would be good changes or additions, but this
has been ignored.
In addition, Mozilla touting minor bugfix releases of Firefox as "major" releases (for the inherent buzz as
many review sites feel compelled to write an article with each major version release) and constant changes
in the browser (best left to beta channels) being forced upon everyone has clearly led to "user fatigue"
and even more so "(extension) developer fatigue" where both users and developers get tired of constantly
having to change their way of working and coding, respectively, with each rapid release.
Pale Moon aims, instead, to follow standards developments and adapt to the changes on the Web, without
losing track of what it is supposed to be: a web browser.
Pale Moon will continue to use the well-known, fully customizable user interface, and will not be
following Mozilla's (and alternative rebuilds') move to the "Australis" user interface (by a number of
people dubbed "FireChrome" because of its likeness with Google's Chrome browser interface) introduced in
Instead, the current plan for Pale Moon is to stick to a stable, solid, and easily maintainable base code
that started off initially as Firefox 24 ESR (with a number of reverted changes to keep maximum
configurability as well as important updates ported back from later Firefox versions) and to maintain and
develop this code further as an independent fork.
Pale Moon aims to remain what it is at its heart: a fully customizable web
"Added tools" are nice, but may not be adopted in Pale Moon if they go beyond what should normally be part
of a web browser for general use.
Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla are registered trademarks of the Mozilla Corporation.
The Pale Moon product/project names and logo are a trademark™ of Moonchild Productions.
Site and contents ©
2009-2015 Moonchild Productions - All rights reserved
Pale Moon's distribution is subject to the following redistribution license